Editor Guidelines
Standards and responsibilities for JBSC editorial board members.
Leading CNS Cancer Research Review
JBSC editors play crucial roles in maintaining publication quality and advancing neuro-oncology research. These guidelines outline expectations for editorial board members.
Manuscript Handling
Evaluate submissions for scope and quality, select reviewers, and make fair decisions based on scientific merit.
Review Coordination
Manage peer review timelines, guide reviewers, and synthesize feedback for authors effectively.
Quality Assurance
Ensure published content meets JBSC standards for CNS cancer research rigor.
- Maintain confidentiality of manuscripts and review process
- Disclose and recuse from conflicts of interest promptly
- Handle misconduct allegations following COPE guidelines
- Make decisions based solely on scientific merit and relevance
Independence: Editorial decisions are based on scientific quality. External pressures do not influence manuscript handling.
Editors should assign reviewers within 7 days and render decisions within 14 days of receiving complete reviews for efficient workflows.
Evaluate CNS tumor submissions for methodological rigor, data quality, and field significance. Consider imaging quality, clinical relevance, and interpretation accuracy.
Respond to editorial correspondence promptly. If unavailable, notify editorial office for reassignment. Professional communication ensures positive experiences.
Senior editors may mentor early-career board members in manuscript evaluation, strengthening the neuro-oncology editorial community and profession overall.
Select reviewers with appropriate CNS tumor expertise and minimal conflicts. Monitor review progress and send reminders. Synthesize perspectives into coherent author guidance.
