Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance for effective toxicology review.
Reviewer Resources for JECT
Resources help reviewers deliver consistent, constructive feedback.
Structured guidance supports rigorous toxicology evaluation.
Journal at a glance: ISSN 2641-7669 | DOI Prefix 10.14302/issn.2641-7669 | License CC BY 4.0 | Peer reviewed, open access journal.
- Structured review templates
- Reporting guideline checklists
- Ethics and conflict of interest guidance
- Examples of high quality reviews
The editorial office provides support for review timelines and questions. Contact [email protected] for assistance.
Use these tools to streamline reviews.
- CONSORT and STROBE reporting checklists
- Guidance on exposure and dose reporting
- Templates for structured feedback
- Ethics review reminders
- Reference sheets for toxicology endpoints
For questions about scope, data reporting, or compliance, contact the editorial team for guidance before submission.
Use these tools to streamline reviews.
- Structured review templates
- Reporting guideline checklists
- Exposure and dose reporting guidance
- Ethics and conflict of interest guidance
- Examples of high quality reviews
- Support contacts for questions
Quick references help reviewers focus on key issues.
- Checklist for exposure reporting
- Guidance on adverse event reporting
- Templates for structured comments
- Reference for regulatory terminology
- Ethics reminders for reviewers
The journal provides practical tools to help reviewers deliver high quality feedback, including templates and reporting checklists. These resources support consistency and fairness across reviews.
If questions arise during review, the editorial office is available to provide guidance and clarify policy expectations.
Use these tools to streamline review preparation.
- Structured review templates
- Checklists for exposure reporting
- Guidance on adverse event reporting
- Reference for regulatory terminology
- Ethics and conflict reminders
- Examples of strong reviews
- Tips for concise feedback
- Contacts for support questions
Use tools to improve review efficiency.
- Apply exposure reporting checklists
- Use structured comment templates
- Reference adverse event guidance
- Check data transparency statements
- Use ethics reminders
- Consult regulatory terminology guides
- Record key strengths and gaps
- Seek editorial support if needed
Use guidance to improve review quality.
- Apply exposure reporting checklists
- Use structured comment templates
- Reference adverse event guidance
- Check data transparency statements
- Use ethics reminders
- Consult regulatory terminology guides
- Document strengths and weaknesses
- Reach out for editorial support
Quick notes on available support.
- Access reporting checklists
- Use structured comment templates
- Review ethics guidance
- Consult regulatory terminology
- Request editorial support when needed
- Apply adverse event guidance
- Maintain consistent review format
Use Reviewer Resources
Leverage tools that support consistent reviews.
These tools help reviewers deliver consistent, high-quality feedback.
- Use the structured review template
- Check reporting guidance
- Note data availability alignment
- Flag ethics concerns early
Use these notes to keep reviews concise and consistent.
- Summarize key strengths
- Flag critical issues
- Recommend clear actions
Focused reviews help authors strengthen toxicology evidence.
- Flag data gaps early
- Recommend clear revisions
