Reviewer Guidelines
Standards and expectations for JCCI peer reviewers.
The Backbone of Scientific Quality
Reviewers are essential to maintaining JCCI's reputation for rigorous, ethical clinical case reporting.
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible scientific publishing. This guide outlines expectations and best practices for JCCI reviewers.
Core Responsibilities
- Evaluate manuscripts objectively for scientific validity, clinical value, and educational merit
- Complete reviews within agreed-upon timeframe (typically 14-21 days)
- Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting assignments
- Maintain strict confidentiality of all manuscript contents
- Provide constructive, specific, and respectful feedback
Review Criteria
When evaluating a case report, consider:
- Novelty and educational value of the clinical presentation
- Completeness of clinical details and follow-up
- Quality and relevance of clinical images
- Accuracy of diagnosis and treatment discussion
- Compliance with ethical standards and patient consent
Ethical Conduct
Reviewers must adhere to COPE guidelines. Do not use ideas or data from manuscripts under review for personal benefit. Report any suspected ethical violations to the Editor-in-Chief.
Questions About Reviewing?
Contact EditorialJournal of Clinical Case
