Editorial Policies
Maintaining the Highest Standards of Scientific Integrity
Commitment to Excellence: IJCV adheres to the highest standards of publication ethics as defined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and international best practices in scholarly publishing.
Peer Review Process
Single-Blind Review Standard
All submissions undergo rigorous Single-Blind Review by subject matter experts, where reviewer identities remain confidential while author identities are known to reviewers. This approach ensures:
- Expert Evaluation: Reviewers can assess work in context of authors' previous contributions
- Constructive Feedback: Reviewers provide detailed, actionable recommendations
- Efficient Process: Streamlined review timeline while maintaining quality
- Reviewer Accountability: Reviewers are known to editors, ensuring responsible evaluation
Double-Blind Review Option
A Double-Blind Review option is available upon request to ensure impartial evaluation where both author and reviewer identities remain confidential throughout the process. Authors may request this option during submission.
Publication Ethics
Research Integrity
- Originality: All submissions must present original, unpublished work
- Plagiarism Prevention: Comprehensive plagiarism screening using advanced detection software
- Data Integrity: Authors must ensure accuracy and authenticity of all data presented
- Proper Attribution: All sources and contributions must be appropriately cited and acknowledged
- Conflict Disclosure: Full disclosure of potential conflicts of interest required
Authorship Standards
IJCV follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines for authorship. All listed authors must meet the following criteria:
- Substantial contribution to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, or interpretation
- Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content
- Final approval of the version to be published
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work
Editorial Independence
IJCV maintains strict editorial independence to ensure unbiased evaluation of all submissions:
Editorial Decisions
All editorial decisions are based solely on scientific merit, relevance, and quality, independent of commercial considerations.
Reviewer Selection
Reviewers are selected based on expertise and absence of conflicts of interest with submitted work.
Transparency
Clear communication of editorial processes, criteria, and decisions to all stakeholders.
Ethical Guidelines
Human Subject Research
- IRB Approval: Institutional Review Board approval required for all human subject research
- Informed Consent: Documentation of appropriate informed consent procedures
- Privacy Protection: Safeguarding of participant privacy and confidentiality
- Vulnerable Populations: Special considerations for research involving vulnerable groups
- Declaration of Helsinki: Adherence to international ethical principles
Animal Research Ethics
- IACUC Approval: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee oversight required
- 3Rs Principle: Commitment to replacement, reduction, and refinement in animal use
- Welfare Standards: Adherence to international animal welfare guidelines
- Reporting Standards: Complete reporting of animal research methodology
Data and Reproducibility
Data Sharing Policy
IJCV encourages open data sharing to promote reproducibility and scientific progress:
- Data Availability Statements: Required for all research articles
- Repository Recommendations: Guidance on appropriate data repositories
- Privacy Considerations: Balance between openness and privacy protection
- Metadata Standards: Comprehensive documentation of datasets
Reproducibility Standards
- Methodological Detail: Sufficient detail for replication of studies
- Statistical Reporting: Complete reporting of statistical methods and results
- Code Availability: Sharing of analysis code when applicable
- Materials Description: Detailed description of materials and reagents
Post-Publication Policies
Corrections and Retractions
- Error Correction: Prompt correction of minor errors that do not affect conclusions
- Errata Publication: Formal errata for significant errors requiring correction
- Retraction Policy: Retraction for serious misconduct or fundamental flaws
- Transparency: Clear documentation of all post-publication changes
Expression of Concern
When concerns arise about published work, IJCV may issue expressions of concern while investigations are ongoing, ensuring transparency and maintaining scientific integrity.
Appeals and Complaints
Appeal Process
Authors may appeal editorial decisions through a formal process:
- Submit written appeal with detailed justification
- Independent editorial review of the decision
- Additional expert consultation if necessary
- Final decision communicated within 30 days
Complaint Handling
IJCV takes all complaints seriously and investigates them thoroughly:
- Confidential reporting mechanism available
- Impartial investigation by independent parties
- Appropriate remedial action when warranted
- Regular policy review and improvement
Contact Information
For questions about editorial policies, ethical concerns, or to report potential misconduct:
Committed to Scientific Excellence
Our editorial policies ensure the highest standards of scientific integrity and research quality.
