Reviewer Guidelines
Standards and expectations for JHHR peer reviewers.
Guardians of Scientific Quality
Reviewers are essential to maintaining JHHR's reputation for rigorous, ethical health research publishing.
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible scientific publishing. This guide outlines expectations and best practices for JHHR reviewers.
Core Responsibilities
- Evaluate manuscripts objectively for scientific validity and health impact
- Complete reviews within agreed-upon timeframe (typically 14-21 days)
- Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting assignments
- Maintain strict confidentiality of all manuscript contents
- Provide constructive, specific, and respectful feedback
Review Criteria
When evaluating a health research manuscript, consider:
- Originality and significance of the research question
- Appropriateness of study design and methodology
- Quality and interpretation of data analysis
- Clarity and logical flow of presentation
- Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical Conduct
Reviewers must adhere to COPE guidelines. Do not use ideas or data from manuscripts under review for personal benefit. Report any suspected ethical violations to the Editor-in-Chief.
