Abstract
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2018
Dilsiz Alparslan.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
The main goal of the conventional periodontal therapy is to control infection and thereby curb disease progression. The mechanical removal of the oral biofilm and adjunctive use of antimicrobial agents have been the conventional methods for periodontal therapy. However, no consensus has been reached on whether conventional periodontal therapy can eliminate periodontal pathogens. Applications of medical ozone are a new treatment modality that has been developing rapidly within various medical specialties since the 1930s. In 1933, Dr. E.A. Fish, first used ozone on a regular basis in his dental practice, and published numerous papers on the subject. While ozone has been evaluated by many clinical studies, the recent studies have reported controversial results about the benefits of its for periodontal treatment. Some current studies showed that a number of the periodontal pathogens are susceptible to medical ozone, suggesting that it is advantageous for conventional periodontal therapy The some systematic reviews conclude that the inclusion of the ozone as an adjunct to conventional periodontal treatment seems to be therapeutically useful.